On-chain intelligence
Nansen vs Arkham
Nansen and Arkham both turn on-chain activity into intelligence — Nansen through labelled smart-money dashboards, Arkham through entity deanonymization and flow visualization. Both are terminals. 1st Node serves the underlying intelligence as API primitives so you build your own.
Nansen
Nansen leads on wallet labelling, smart-money dashboards and curated analytics.
Arkham
Arkham leads on entity attribution and on-chain flow visualization.
Both are UI-first; querying labels, clusters and paths programmatically to power your own product is limited.
Where 1st Node fits
- Entity clusters, labels and smart-money netflow returned as data.
- Counterparty graph and path-finding as queryable primitives.
- Pair intelligence with raw RPC, prices and AML on a single key.
- Credit-metered so you scale by usage, not seat count.
常见问题
Can I build my own terminal?
That's the intended use — the intelligence plane is API-first so you own the interface.
Do you provide labels and clusters?
Yes — cluster, entity and label data are intelligence primitives.
充值、拿密钥、上线。
自助开通。支持加密货币或银行卡。按额度计费——重型原语更贵，简单调用很便宜。
获取 API 密钥