Alchemy vs Infura
Alchemy and Infura are the two default EVM RPC gateways. Alchemy pushes enhanced APIs; Infura wins on ubiquity and simplicity. Either way the stack above RPC — analytics, compliance, payouts — is a separate build. 1st Node consolidates it onto one key.
Alchemy
Alchemy leads on enhanced token/NFT APIs, webhooks and developer ergonomics.
Infura
Infura leads on ubiquity, dependable Ethereum/L2 RPC and IPFS.
Neither serves the intelligence graph, AML/KYT or processing primitives — those become extra vendors.
Where 1st Node fits
- Reliable JSON-RPC with archive across BTC, ETH and TRON on our own nodes.
- Enhanced data (net-worth, decoded logs, holders) without a second product.
- Intelligence and AML on the same key for analytics and compliance.
- Credit-metered so heavy primitives cost more and simple RPC stays cheap.
Sıkça sorulanlar
Which is easier to migrate from?
Both — we speak standard JSON-RPC, so either integration moves with a base-URL and auth-header change.
Do you support non-EVM chains?
Yes — Bitcoin and TRON run on our own archive nodes alongside Ethereum.
Bakiye yükle, anahtarını al, yayına çık.
Self servis. Kripto ya da kartla öde. Krediyle ölçümlenir — ağır ilkel yapılar daha pahalı, basitler ucuz.
API anahtarı al