AML

Detect mixer exposure

Mixer exposure measures how close an address sits to a tumbling service. The risk endpoint surfaces a mixer category with a hop count; a fund-flow trace confirms the path. Store both so the proximity finding is defensible.

Başlamadan önce
  • A live API key with AML scope.
  • The address and chain you want to evaluate.

1Check the exposure array

Request the risk score and inspect the exposure array for a mixer category. The hops field tells you how many transaction steps separate the address from the mixer. This is a C3 call.

curl https://api.1st-node.com/v1/aml/eth/0x7c3d.../risk \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_..."
> { "score": 81, "risk_level": "high", "confidence": 0.9, "exposure": [{ "category": "mixer", "hops": 1 }] }

2Confirm the path with a fund-flow trace

When exposure shows a low hop count, trace the inbound flow to see the actual path to the mixer. Fund-flow tracing is a C4 call, so reserve it for confirmation rather than blanket screening.

curl "https://api.1st-node.com/v1/intel/eth/0x7c3d.../flow?dir=in&hops=3" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk_live_..."

3Grade by hop distance

Direct exposure at hop 1 is materially different from hop 3. Apply stricter handling to shorter distances and record the hop count that drove the grading.

Sıkça sorulanlar

Why not always run the fund-flow trace?

Fund-flow tracing is the heaviest C4 call. Use the C3 risk score to detect mixer exposure first, then trace only when a low hop count warrants confirmation.

Does hop distance change the risk?

Yes. Hop 1 is direct interaction; higher hops mean intermediaries between the address and the mixer. Grade handling accordingly.

Okumaya devam et

Bakiye yükle, anahtarını al, yayına çık.

Self servis. Kripto ya da kartla öde. Krediyle ölçümlenir — ağır ilkel yapılar daha pahalı, basitler ucuz.

API anahtarı al